Because I’ve successfully stopped reading TMZ, much less Gawker, I missed this whole thing about the writing professor who e-mailed his graduate students to announce that his wife was leaving him to be part of the “collection” of a famous media mogul (also see follow-up here). Every so often a fellow traveler in sociology will say something like, “Wouldn’t it be cool to have a sitcom set in academia?” To which I can only reply, Continue reading “tttmi”
I recently received this query from a colleague:
I’m two weeks into my first course (Intro to Soc) and trying to make some rigid rules about prep time. I am realizing (as I’d been warned) that I could prep and prep and prep all the time. Do you have rules about how much time you spend prepping for class? Continue reading “prep!”
Hi everyone! With all this discussion of incentives going on, or something, Jeremy lent me the keys to bring in a view from the economics (and/or non-academic) side of things.
If I were offered the chance to eliminate forever one influence of Econ 101 reasoning from the popular discourse, it would be hard to resist the temptation to spare the world justifications of various policies based on reverse Mary Poppins incentive arguments. That is, there must be a spoonful of medicine to keep peoples’ mitts out of various sugar bowls. [*]
Apart from the one being a joke and one not, there’s not much difference in logic between:
Threatening to slicing off a bit of someone’s toe provides an incentive to stay away from Coldstone Creamery and promotes a healthy diet,
Threatening cervical cancer provides an incentive to stay away from premarital sex and promotes chastity;
the latter being an actual argument floated in some parts of Greater Wingnuttia against vaccination for HPV. [**] The particular annoyance, I suppose, is that the incentive arrangement is often irrelevant in these cases; the religious right may well oppose STD vaccination even if they couldn’t try to argue that it would make society sluttier. This separates these from ordinary disincentive cases such as taxing gasoline to align private and social costs of driving or threatening would-be criminals with time in the slammer.
[*] Why yes, I did recently watch Mary Poppins with the kids.
[**] As policies, these would likely fail for different reasons. The former is effective-looking but lacks a commitment mechanism for people who don’t have professional torturers shadowing them during Coldstone Creamery’s business hours [***]. The latter is likely to suffer from some combination of bounded rationality and imperfect information.
[***] Why yes, I am reading Gene Wolfe’s Book of the New Sun, an account of the adventures of a journeyman torturer in a far-future dystopia.
So, you know I’m having trouble sleeping when it’s past 3am and I think, “I haven’t read Footnotes in awhile.” (Footnotes is the American Sociological Association newsletter.) I see the election slate for 2008 has been announced. We are now two years removed from the curious turn of events where ASA followed up the sweep of top six ASA positions by women in 2005 with the mysterious nomination of only men for top positions in 2006 [see coverage on my old blog here and here]. Last year, the gender preference of the electorate was not undemocratically precluded, and the outcome was 13 women vs. 5 men for the top 18 posts. This year, the nominations seem like they’ve gone farther to just enact the electorate’s preference at the outset, as the nominee count is 26 women versus 10 men. My prediction is that it will end up 14-4, with the male victories including one seat on Council and one on Publications. I think the 18-0 full gynosweep that ASA election observers have been waiting for is still 7-10 years away.
Three colleagues and I are putting the final touches on an NSF grant, due Tuesday, and one of today’s tasks is to produce the 2-page version of our CVs. The format of the two pager is laid out in the Grant Proposal Guide, and is longer in words than most of these “biographical sketches” will be. It starts with a long list of things to NOT list and then goes on to enumerate what MUST be included. The NOT list are things that are “irrelevant to the merits of the proposal.” Of course, if you ask me, the very first thing on the MUST list is irrelevant as well: Continue reading “pointless activity #725: nsf 2-page cvs”
The other day Omar and I were listening to an NPR segment reporting that leading economists were predicting a 50/50 chance of a recession in 2008. We immediately turned to one another and asked where our careers would be heading if we made a habit out of predicting 50/50 chances of anything. Continue reading “we have stars, they have punctuation.”
I am serving on the graduate admissions committee here. Three faculty, three graduate students, about 250 files.* Northwestern’s entering cohort last year was 8.
Of course the files include GRE scores. Continue reading “fairness and do-overs”