don’t sacrifice college to the pandemic

I wrote a letter to the NY Times in response to Richard Arum and Mitchell Stevens’ “What is a College Education in the Time of Coronavirus?“. Unsurprisingly, the letter was not published, so I offer it here as a conversation-starter on lessons we should and shouldn’t learn from higher education’s current situation.

To the Editor:

Among the many people who have stepped up to the challenge posed by the pandemic, I’ve been proud of my colleagues in the academy who have adapted thousands of classes for millions of students. But I fear the lessons Drs. Arum and Stevens (“What is a College Education in the Time of Coronavirus?” March 18) suggest we draw from from this mobilization are wrong. We cannot allow this crisis response to become an excuse to shortchange quality and opportunity for a generation of college students.

The essence of American higher education is its combination of intensity and breadth. When it’s all working great, students from all walks of life join in intellectual communities to engage with ideas, arguments, knowledge, and evidence. They synthesize habits of mind not just from content delivered in isolated classes but also from a potent mixture of those classes and intentional curriculum as a guide to understanding activities, experiences, conversations, disagreements, and epiphanies. That synthesis prepares them well: not just for their careers but also to take on urgent, complicated tasks of citizenship, leadership, creativity, and innovation.

Colleges can indeed improve: most importantly by expanding access to all qualified students while sustaining and increasing the quality of education. We will learn valuable lessons from this spring’s mass migration online, but those lessons need to be about how to do a better job for more students, not how to cut corners and compromise quality.

Author: andrewperrin

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

2 thoughts on “don’t sacrifice college to the pandemic”

  1. This doesn’t read like sociology at all.
    Better to be asking the question about what will replace the credentialing system that we now have.
    Before, indentured apprenticeship supplied training, food and clothing, moral instruction, and most important of all, distributed labor to where it was needed.
    This centuries old social institution was crushed by 1840s from industrial revolution, advent of wage labor.
    We need your ideas on what comes next for America’s youth — post-CORVID-19.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: