Kieran’s recent analysis of philosophy citations reminded me that I’ve wanted to publish something similar for sociology. So here it is and here’s how you can build a reference network at home.
The idea is pretty straightforward. You download a set of articles from Web of Science, including references. This could either be all the articles from a list of journals, all articles on a common theme, or articles that cite a specific manuscript or author. In this case, I’ve grabbed 3,257 articles published in 50 US sociological journals in 2011 or 2012.
The content of the articles is not really of interest for our purposes. Instead, I look at the works that are cited, the pairs of works that get cited together, and the clusters of works that are commonly cited together. Through the magic of network analysis, it turns out that the clusters of works that are commonly cited together tend to map onto what we think of as fields, subfields or areas of research (e.g., social movements or health disparities).
In this analysis, I looked at the 10,976 books or articles that had been cited at least three times in the 3,257 articles from the journals. I considered articles connected if they were mentioned together more than once. These connections produced a total of 95,061 edges. I’m using fairly arbitrary cut points, and you get slightly different clusters depending on how many nodes and edges you use.
Below are the top results for my analysis of sociological journals. Each cluster starts with a list of the “Journals”, which are the journals that disproportionately publish work in the cluster. You will then see an emboldened list of words used most frequently in abstracts/titles that cite lots of work in a cluster. “Name” is the abbreviated name of the cited work; “centrality” is the within cluster betweeness centrality; and “frequency” is the total number of times the work was cited across all clusters. If you click on the name of an article, it will take you to a page that shows all the articles in the dataset that cite that work.
Journals: Social Science Research (231), Journal of Marriage and Family (157), Sociology of Health & Illness (147), Demography (130), Social Forces (117), Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (103), Social Networks (94), Sociological Forum (93), American Sociological Review (81), Deviant Behavior (79), Population Research and Policy Review (77), Social Compass (70), Gender & Society (68), International Migration Review (67), American Journal of Sociology (66), Journal of Health and Social Behavior (64), Criminology (63), Review of Religious Research (62), Sociological Perspectives (61), Sociological Quarterly (59), Sociological Spectrum (58), Socio-economic Review (57), Poetics (56), Qualitative Sociology (54), Symbolic Interaction (53), Annual Review of Sociology (53), Punishment & Society-international Journal of Penology (52), Sociological Inquiry (52), Teaching Sociology (51), Theory and Society (50), Mobilization (50), Social Problems (50), Sociological Methods & Research (49), Ethnography (49), Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (48), Theoretical Criminology (47), Social Politics (45), Rural Sociology (44), Sociology of Education (39), Homicide Studies (39), Studies in Symbolic Interaction (38), Sociology of Religion (36), City & Community (36), Social Psychology Quarterly (35), Work and Occupations (33), Feminist Criminology (30), Sociological Theory (29), Journal of Mathematical Sociology (23), Sociological Methodology (13)
network, networks, ties, structure, individuals, models, model, high, capital, survey
Journals: Social Networks, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Sociology of Education, Sociological Theory
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Granovetter M (1973) Am J Sociol | 0.21 | 97 | network, networks, ties, important, survey | |
Coleman J (1990) Fdn Social Theory | 0.20 | 80 | network, capital, networks, survey, individual | |
Wasserman S (1994) Social Network Anal | 0.11 | 47 | network, networks, structure, models, random | |
Coleman J (1988) Am J Sociol | 0.09 | 84 | capital, high, survey, important, ties | |
Mcpherson M (2001) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.09 | 72 | network, networks, ties, longitudinal, models | |
Putnam R (2000) Bowling Alone Collap | 0.06 | 106 | survey, capital, political, participation, religious | |
Burt R (1992) Structural Holes Soc | 0.06 | 42 | network, networks, ties, structure, capital | |
Portes A (1998) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.03 | 58 | capital, survey, network, ties, status | |
Granovetter M (1985) Am J Sociol | 0.03 | 37 | network, networks, recent, cultural, differences | |
Lin N (2001) Social Capital Theor | 0.02 | 39 | capital, network, networks, resources, ties | |
Blau P (1977) Inequality Heterogen | 0.02 | 38 | networks, network, important, levels, level | |
Freeman L (1979) Soc Networks | 0.02 | 23 | network, networks, structure, graph, relations | |
Haynie D (2001) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 19 | adolescent, behavior, peer, influence, longitudinal | |
Snijders T (2010) Soc Networks | 0.02 | 20 | network, networks, process, longitudinal, structure | |
Blau P (1964) Exchange Power Socia | 0.02 | 29 | exchange, network, theory, relations, levels | |
Feld S (1981) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 22 | network, networks, ties, individuals, structure | |
Krackhardt D (1987) Soc Networks | 0.02 | 16 | network, networks, structure, ties, structural | |
Wellman B (1990) Am J Sociol | 0.01 | 23 | network, networks, ties, individuals, health | |
Berkman L (2000) Soc Sci Med | 0.01 | 21 | health, network, national, relationships, survey | |
Marsden P (1987) Am Sociol Rev | 0.01 | 26 | network, networks, ties, survey, resources | |
Snijders T (2001) Sociol Methodol | 0.01 | 18 | network, networks, models, stochastic, longitudinal | |
Moody J (2001) Am J Sociol | 0.01 | 20 | network, networks, schools, school, theory | |
Snijders T (2006) Sociol Methodol | 0.01 | 17 | network, networks, graph, random, models | |
Johnstone J (1961) Adolescent Soc Socia | 0.01 | 14 | school, longitudinal, schools, students, contrast | |
Uzzi B (1996) Am Sociol Rev | 0.01 | 16 | network, networks, embeddedness, economic, embedded |
movement, political, movements, organizations, theory, role, well, institutional, literature, change
Journals: Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Mobilization, Socio-economic Review, Sociological Theory
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Dimaggio P (1983) Am Sociol Rev | 0.26 | 64 | theory, organizations, organizational, institutional, yet | |
Mcadam D (2001) Dynamics Contention | 0.12 | 41 | movement, political, movements, states, united | |
Mcadam D (1982) Political Process De | 0.09 | 34 | political, movement, movements, yet, mobilization | |
Benford R (2000) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.06 | 36 | movement, political, framing, cultural, movements | |
Mccarthy J (1977) Am J Sociol | 0.05 | 25 | movement, political, organizations, movements, theory | |
Meyer J (1977) Am J Sociol | 0.05 | 50 | organizations, organizational, institutional, theory, theories | |
Mcadam D (1996) Comp Perspectives So | 0.05 | 32 | movement, movements, political, organizations, mobilization | |
Tilly C (1978) Mobilization Revolut | 0.04 | 31 | political, movement, protest, mobilization, role | |
Polletta F (2001) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.04 | 24 | movement, political, movements, organizations, members | |
Snow D (1988) Int Social Movement | 0.04 | 26 | movement, movements, process, theory, framing | |
Friedland R (1991) New I Org Anal | 0.04 | 23 | theory, institutional, cultural, work, sociological | |
Prasad M (2006) Politics Free Market | 0.03 | 9 | political, global, sociological, economic, politics | |
Goodwin J (2001) Passionate Politics | 0.03 | 15 | theory, political, emotions, movement, understanding | |
Gamson W (1992) Talking Politics | 0.03 | 25 | movement, political, yet, collective, public | |
Fligstein N (2001) Sociol Theor | 0.02 | 15 | political, institutional, sociological, theory, fields | |
Armstrong E (2002) Forging Gay Identiti | 0.02 | 18 | political, cultural, movement, change, gay | |
Inglehart R (1990) Culture Shift Adv in | 0.02 | 14 | political, economic, survey, changes, environmental | |
Epstein S (1996) Impure Sci Aids Acti | 0.02 | 14 | political, interviews, knowledge, state, examines | |
Abbott A (1988) System Professions E | 0.02 | 18 | professions, sociological, studies, processes, yet | |
Taylor V (1992) Frontiers Social Mov | 0.02 | 19 | political, movements, movement, members, american | |
Lichterman P (1996) Search Political Com | 0.02 | 12 | political, movement, organization, although, public | |
Diani M (2003) Social Movements Net | 0.02 | 19 | movement, networks, organizations, movements, network | |
Dimaggio P (1991) New I Org Anal | 0.02 | 24 | action, institutional, movement, organizations, theory | |
Snow D (1986) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 29 | movement, political, movements, framing, frame | |
Fligstein N (2001) Architecture Markets | 0.02 | 20 | economic, market, institutional, firms, institutions |
work, interviews, identity, gender, women, theory, drawing, ways, experiences, them
Journals: Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Symbolic Interaction, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Social Psychology Quarterly
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Goffman E (1963) Stigma Notes Managem | 0.19 | 76 | stigma, identity, work, self, individuals | |
Goffman E (1959) Presentation Self Ev | 0.15 | 92 | identity, work, them, theory, life | |
Glaser B (1967) Discovery Grounded T | 0.10 | 85 | interviews, work, qualitative, ways, identity | |
West C (1987) Gender Soc | 0.10 | 66 | gender, women, men, gendered, women’s | |
Hochschild A (1983) Managed Heart Commer | 0.10 | 41 | work, interviews, emotional, ways, identity | |
Blumer H (1969) Symbolic Interaction | 0.07 | 55 | identity, processes, work, interaction, interviews | |
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounde | 0.06 | 54 | interviews, work, identity, women, them | |
Connell R (1995) Masculinities | 0.06 | 40 | men, gender, masculinity, interviews, women | |
Garfinkel H (1967) Studies Ethnomethodo | 0.06 | 44 | work, interaction, drawing, identity, understanding | |
Mead G (1934) Mind Self Soc | 0.06 | 50 | theory, processes, self, others, work | |
Scott M (1968) Am Sociol Rev | 0.06 | 32 | identity, interviews, work, cultural, them | |
Giddens A (1991) Modernity Self Ident | 0.05 | 50 | interviews, life, cultural, health, drawing | |
Snow D (1987) Am J Sociol | 0.05 | 27 | identity, them, cultural, interviews, themselves | |
Crenshaw K (1991) Stanford Law Rev | 0.04 | 15 | gender, race, women, intersectionality, policy | |
Collins P (2000) Black Feminist Thoug | 0.03 | 28 | race, gender, ways, women, work | |
Link B (2001) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.02 | 30 | stigma, health, individuals, theory, interaction | |
Schwalbe M (2000) Soc Forces | 0.02 | 17 | identity, inequality, gender, men, strategies | |
Becker H (1963) Outsiders Studies So | 0.02 | 34 | identity, individuals, work, them, stigma | |
Sykes G (1957) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 27 | work, them, identity, moral, theory | |
Habermas J (1984) Theory Communicative | 0.02 | 12 | theory, forms, so, account, explores | |
Stryker S (1980) Symbolic Interaction | 0.02 | 16 | identity, self, theory, others, life | |
Emerson R (1995) Writing Ethnographic | 0.02 | 25 | work, others, context, qualitative, people | |
Cooley C (1902) Human Nature Social | 0.02 | 19 | identity, others, theory, themselves, work | |
Stryker S (2000) Soc Psychol Quart | 0.02 | 17 | identity, self, themselves, theory, actors | |
Collins P (2004) Black Sexual Politic | 0.02 | 19 | gender, race, black, men, women |
religious, religion, survey, national, beliefs, life, church, influence, attendance, levels
Journals: Review of Religious Research, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Sociology of Religion, Sociological Spectrum
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Steensland B (2000) Soc Forces | 0.41 | 76 | religious, religion, survey, national, beliefs | |
Stark R (2000) Acts Faith Explainin | 0.11 | 36 | religious, religion, survey, attendance, beliefs | |
Smith C (1998) Am Evangelicalism Em | 0.06 | 32 | religious, religion, influence, evangelical, survey | |
Verba S (1995) Voice Equality Civic | 0.05 | 30 | survey, participation, engagement, political, civic | |
Smith C (2003) J Sci Stud Relig | 0.04 | 18 | religious, national, religion, youth, role | |
Putnam R (2010) Am Grace Relig Divid | 0.04 | 22 | religious, religion, survey, groups, national | |
Smith C (2005) Soul Searching Relig | 0.04 | 19 | religious, religion, youth, national, religiosity | |
Berger P (1967) Sacred Canopy Elemen | 0.03 | 26 | religious, religion, survey, contemporary, groups | |
Chaves M (2004) Congregations Am | 0.03 | 28 | religious, congregations, congregational, national, survey | |
Uslaner E (2002) Moral Fdn Trust | 0.02 | 13 | trust, survey, generalized, general, level | |
Hunter J (1991) Culture Wars Struggl | 0.02 | 17 | culture, religious, american, political, public | |
Norris P (2004) Sacred Secular Relig | 0.02 | 22 | religious, survey, attendance, religion, belief | |
Casanova J (1994) Public Relig Modern | 0.02 | 20 | religious, religion, contemporary, public, political | |
Stark R (1996) Sociol Relig | 0.02 | 14 | religious, religion, role, survey, national | |
Edgell P (2006) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 17 | religious, religion, american, life, survey | |
Hout M (2002) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 24 | religious, survey, religion, belief, national | |
Dimaggio P (1996) Am J Sociol | 0.01 | 12 | public, culture, political, change, american | |
Ellison C (1995) Soc Forces | 0.01 | 10 | religious, survey, religion, role, attendance | |
Eccles J (1999) J Adolescent Res | 0.01 | 6 | activities, involvement, participation, school, found | |
Krause N (2008) Aging Church Social | 0.01 | 12 | religious, survey, older, nationwide, relationships | |
Iannaccone L (1994) Am J Sociol | 0.01 | 17 | religious, survey, religion, national, groups | |
Wilson J (1997) Am Sociol Rev | 0.01 | 7 | survey, people, volunteer, national, religious | |
Pargament K (1997) Psychol Relig Coping | 0.01 | 14 | religious, relationships, health, religion, involvement | |
Bellah R (1985) Habits Heart Individ | 0.01 | 23 | religious, religion, contemporary, survey, political | |
Ellison C (1991) J Health Soc Behav | 0.01 | 11 | religious, religion, attendance, national, involvement |
crime, theory, criminal, behavior, studies, well, models, offending, individuals, violence
Journals: Criminology, Homicide Studies, Deviant Behavior, Feminist Criminology
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Gottfredson M (1990) Gen Theory Crime | 0.23 | 72 | crime, behavior, longitudinal, criminal, theory | |
Sampson R (1997) Science | 0.12 | 57 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, models, crime, characteristics | |
Hirschi T (1969) Causes Delinquency | 0.10 | 57 | crime, youth, national, behavior, school | |
Anderson E (1999) Code Street Decency | 0.09 | 52 | urban, cultural, understanding, violence, men | |
Laub J (2003) Shared Beginnings Di | 0.06 | 33 | crime, criminal, offending, behavior, longitudinal | |
Cohen L (1979) Am Sociol Rev | 0.06 | 26 | crime, criminal, theory, rates, limited | |
Sampson R (1993) Crime Making Pathway | 0.06 | 33 | behavior, national, longitudinal, criminal, crime | |
Long J (1997) Regression Models Ca | 0.05 | 38 | national, influence, relationships, time, health | |
Shaw C (1942) Juvenile Delinquency | 0.04 | 29 | neighborhood, crime, models, rates, areas | |
Moffitt T (1993) Psychol Rev | 0.04 | 23 | criminal, behavior, crime, offending, including | |
Sampson R (1989) Am J Sociol | 0.03 | 28 | neighborhood, characteristics, crime, structural, levels | |
Maruna S (2001) Making Good Exconvic | 0.03 | 26 | criminal, behavior, future, offending, prison | |
Anselin L (1988) Spatial Econometrics | 0.03 | 16 | regression, spatial, limited, rates, theories | |
Royston P (2005) Stata J | 0.02 | 31 | family, national, children, longitudinal, health | |
Krivo L (1996) Soc Forces | 0.02 | 15 | crime, neighborhood, neighborhoods, rates, models | |
Blau J (1982) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 15 | crime, rates, violence, structural, violent | |
Land K (1990) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 17 | crime, rates, higher, rate, homicide | |
Sampson R (1999) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 19 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, models, crime, direct | |
Anderson E (1990) Streetwise Race Clas | 0.02 | 22 | conditions, processes, studies, american, individuals | |
Haynie D (2005) Soc Forces | 0.02 | 23 | adolescents, behavior, peer, school, characteristics | |
Bursik R (1993) Neighborhoods Crime | 0.02 | 20 | crime, neighborhood, neighborhoods, characteristics, community | |
Akers R (1998) Social Learning Soci | 0.02 | 20 | theory, behavior, learning, literature, deviant | |
Hirschi T (1983) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 14 | delinquency, crime, national, higher, similar | |
Elliott D (1985) Explaining Delinquen | 0.02 | 14 | delinquency, delinquent, behavior, peer, survey | |
Pratt T (2000) Criminology | 0.02 | 12 | self-control, crime, peers, impact, modeling |
family, children, survey, marriage, women, families, married, mothers, parents, national
Journals: Journal of Marriage and Family, Population Research and Policy Review, Demography, Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Sandefur G (1994) Growing Single Paren | 0.14 | 41 | children, families, family, parents, longitudinal | |
Edin K (2005) Promises I Can Keep | 0.10 | 41 | women, national, mothers, family, survey | |
Cherlin A (2004) J Marriage Fam | 0.10 | 28 | marriage, national, survey, married, health | |
Sarkisian N (2008) J Marriage Fam | 0.08 | 15 | mothers, family, children, families, parents | |
Bumpass L (2000) Pop Stud-j Demog | 0.07 | 30 | family, national, cohabitation, married, differences | |
Osborne C (2007) J Marriage Fam | 0.07 | 23 | children, family, families, mothers, marriage | |
Hogan D (1993) Am J Sociol | 0.05 | 16 | children, family, families, parents, relationships | |
Nock S (1995) J Fam Issues | 0.04 | 19 | married, cohabiting, cohabitation, survey, marriage | |
Thornton A (2001) J Marriage Fam | 0.04 | 28 | survey, family, marriage, gender, women | |
Kennedy S (2008) Demogr Res | 0.04 | 23 | family, married, cohabiting, marriage, children | |
Fomby P (2007) Am Sociol Rev | 0.04 | 22 | children, family, families, mothers, longitudinal | |
Oppenheimer V (1997) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.03 | 14 | economic, women, health, divorce, survey | |
Nomaguchi K (2003) J Marriage Fam | 0.03 | 14 | national, survey, married, mothers, adults | |
Carlson M (2004) Demography | 0.03 | 18 | marriage, marital, mothers, children, survey | |
Waite L (2000) Case Marriage Why Ma | 0.03 | 21 | marriage, survey, women, married, differences | |
Mclanahan S (2008) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.03 | 19 | family, families, health, children, women | |
Becker G (1981) Treatise Family | 0.03 | 27 | women, survey, first, marriage, education | |
Mclanahan S (2004) Demography | 0.03 | 23 | survey, education, marriage, family, women | |
Eggebeen D (2005) Soc Forces | 0.03 | 10 | married, cohabitation, adult, greater, found | |
Bengtson V (2001) J Marriage Fam | 0.03 | 15 | children, parents, family, adult, life | |
Ruggles S (2007) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 10 | households, children, living, family, families | |
Allison P (2002) Missing Data | 0.02 | 39 | child, models, important, health, children | |
Allison P (1995) Survival Anal Using | 0.02 | 20 | survey, groups, national, women, risk | |
Landale N (2007) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.02 | 7 | survey, fertility, family, women, hispanic | |
Waite L (1995) Demography | 0.02 | 17 | survey, marriage, national, women, marital |
immigrants, migration, immigrant, states, survey, children, groups, united, population, differences
Journals: International Migration Review, Rural Sociology, Population Research and Policy Review, Demography
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Alba R (2003) Remaking Am Mainstre | 0.31 | 66 | immigrants, immigrant, groups, survey, differences | |
Portes A (1993) Ann Am Acad Polit Ss | 0.13 | 53 | immigrants, immigrant, groups, status, children | |
Portes A (2001) Legacies Story Immig | 0.12 | 52 | immigrants, immigrant, children, ethnic, states | |
Gordon M (1964) Assimilation Am Life | 0.10 | 47 | immigrants, ethnic, groups, assimilation, differences | |
Massey D (2002) Smoke Mirrors Mexica | 0.07 | 22 | migration, united, status, states, immigrant | |
Portes A (2006) Immigrant America: a Portrait | 0.05 | 32 | immigrant, immigrants, children, economic, states | |
Massey D (2008) New Faces New Places | 0.04 | 18 | economic, immigrant, destinations, survey, population | |
Massey D (1997) Am J Sociol | 0.04 | 21 | migration, migrants, mexican, population, destinations | |
Parrenas R (2001) Servants Globalizati | 0.04 | 14 | family, migration, gender, countries, families | |
Holdaway J (2008) Inheriting City Chil | 0.03 | 24 | immigrant, children, second-generation, immigrants, assimilation | |
Qian Z (2007) Am Sociol Rev | 0.03 | 26 | survey, racial, marriage, national, groups | |
Wirth L (1938) Am J Sociol | 0.03 | 20 | urban, community, important, communities, theory | |
Kandel W (2001) Int Migr Rev | 0.02 | 9 | migration, family, educational, children, education | |
Massey D (1994) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 10 | migration, migrants, states, mexican, origin | |
Zhou M (1997) Int Migr Rev | 0.02 | 25 | immigrants, immigrant, children, status, groups | |
Lichter M (2003) Other Half Works Imm | 0.02 | 12 | market, labor, immigrants, immigrant, workers | |
Menjivar C (2000) Fragmented Ties Salv | 0.02 | 14 | family, networks, families, experience, survey | |
Donato K (2007) Rural Sociol | 0.02 | 11 | areas, rural, economic, destinations, population | |
Massey D (1987) Return Aztlan Social | 0.02 | 14 | migration, immigrant, migrants, mexican, us | |
Lichter D (2007) Rural Sociol | 0.02 | 9 | rural, labor, population, key, community | |
Waters M (1999) Black Identities W I | 0.02 | 18 | immigrants, children, immigrant, status, racial | |
Schwartz C (2005) Demography | 0.02 | 20 | survey, educational, marriage, women, education | |
Fussell E (2004) Demography | 0.02 | 11 | migration, mexican, origin, population, mexico | |
Zuniga V (2005) New Destinations Mex. | 0.01 | 10 | areas, destinations, immigrant, patterns, destination | |
Beck-gernsheim E (2007) Global Netw | 0.01 | 5 | family, migrant, differences, migrants, marriage |
cultural, work, interviews, capital, sociology, theory, drawing, practices, processes, culture
Journals: Poetics, Theory and Society, Ethnography, Sociological Theory
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction Social C | 0.23 | 96 | cultural, capital, class, survey, interviews | |
Swidler A (1986) Am Sociol Rev | 0.18 | 73 | cultural, culture, work, understanding, people | |
Lareau A (2003) Unequal Childhoods C | 0.12 | 57 | children, family, parents, educational, differences | |
Lamont M (1992) Money Morals Manners | 0.07 | 33 | cultural, class, studies, approach, first | |
Bourdieu P (1990) Logic Practice | 0.07 | 42 | cultural, theory, interviews, drawing, habitus | |
Collins R (2004) Interaction Ritual C | 0.06 | 41 | interaction, theory, cultural, work, understanding | |
Dimaggio P (1997) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.06 | 33 | cultural, theory, religious, culture, yet | |
Bourdieu P (1977) Outline Theory Pract | 0.05 | 48 | work, cultural, approach, individuals, practice | |
Swidler A (2001) Talk Love Culture Ma | 0.04 | 30 | cultural, interviews, culture, work, approach | |
Becker H (1982) Art Worlds | 0.04 | 21 | theory, work, art, cultural, understanding | |
Brubaker R (1992) Citizenship Nationho | 0.04 | 8 | political, processes, state, past, strong | |
Peterson R (1996) Am Sociol Rev | 0.04 | 29 | cultural, capital, survey, culture, participation | |
Vaisey S (2009) Am J Sociol | 0.03 | 24 | religious, sociology, work, cultural, religion | |
Dimaggio P (1987) Am Sociol Rev | 0.03 | 26 | cultural, often, networks, yet, processes | |
Lamont M (1988) Sociological Theory | 0.03 | 17 | cultural, capital, activities, class, children | |
Gross N (2009) Am Sociol Rev | 0.03 | 19 | work, theory, pragmatist, action, process | |
Anderson B (1991) Imagined Communities | 0.03 | 16 | perspective, explores, them, concept, ethnographic | |
Tilly C (1990) Coercion Capital Eur | 0.03 | 11 | theoretical, political, state, growing, explores | |
Sewell W (1992) Am J Sociol | 0.03 | 38 | cultural, well, work, change, culture | |
Mann M (1986) Sources Social Power | 0.02 | 11 | state, sociological, key, political, understanding | |
Lizardo O (2006) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 19 | cultural, network, networks, culture, structure | |
Lamont M (2000) Dignity Working Men | 0.02 | 28 | cultural, interviews, work, studies, them | |
Lamont M (2002) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.02 | 38 | cultural, boundaries, interviews, race, processes | |
Haidt J (2001) Psychol Rev | 0.02 | 4 | cultural, action, individuals, sociology, moral | |
Geertz C (1973) Interpretation Cultu | 0.02 | 33 | life, religious, ethnographic, work, cultural |
work, gender, women, labor, survey, family, time, women’s, men, differences
Journals: Work and Occupations, Gender & Society, American Sociological Review, Social Forces
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Jacobs J (2004) Time Divide Work Fam | 0.20 | 27 | work, hours, survey, national, work-family | |
Correll S (2007) Am J Sociol | 0.14 | 36 | women, work, gender, men, women’s | |
Budig M (2001) Am Sociol Rev | 0.12 | 25 | work, women, gender, women’s, mothers | |
Blair-loy M (2003) Competing Devotions | 0.07 | 21 | work, gender, hours, interviews, women’s | |
Bianchi S (2000) Soc Forces | 0.06 | 21 | gender, time, work, housework, hours | |
Kanter R (1977) Men Women Corporatio | 0.06 | 25 | gender, women, men, work, job | |
Ridgeway C (2004) Gender Soc | 0.05 | 25 | gender, women, work, differences, women’s | |
England P (2010) Gender Soc | 0.05 | 22 | gender, women, women’s, work, men | |
Hochschild A (1997) Time Bind Work Becom | 0.05 | 22 | work, gender, family, women, time | |
Hays S (1996) Cultural Contradicti | 0.04 | 32 | work, children, mothers, interviews, family | |
Coltrane S (2000) J Marriage Fam | 0.03 | 17 | gender, work, housework, time, married | |
Fuwa M (2004) Am Sociol Rev | 0.03 | 12 | gender, countries, division, labor, family | |
Bianchi S (2006) Changing Rhythms Am | 0.03 | 27 | work, time, mothers, gender, children | |
Stone P (2007) Opting Out: | 0.03 | 18 | work, gender, survey, women, longitudinal | |
Charles M (2004) Occupational Ghettos | 0.02 | 10 | gender, women, work, equality, well | |
Acker J (1990) Gender Soc | 0.02 | 25 | gender, work, women, gendered, men | |
Reskin B (1993) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.02 | 11 | gender, women, work, differences, men | |
Bittman M (2003) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 19 | time, gender, women, women’s, work | |
Cohen P (2007) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 8 | women, men, gender, large, suggests | |
Gorman E (2005) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 12 | gender, sex, well, women’s, women | |
Mennino S (2005) Sociol Quart | 0.02 | 9 | work, national, workplace, role, changing | |
Tomaskovic-devey D (1993) Gender Racial Inequa | 0.02 | 11 | men, important, work, levels, market | |
Radloff L (1977) Applied Psychological Measur | 0.02 | 36 | health, national, survey, longitudinal, mental | |
Yeung W (2001) J Marriage Fam | 0.02 | 5 | child, children, fathers, father, greater | |
Brooks C (2004) Soc Sci Res | 0.02 | 12 | survey, gender, attitudes, models, recent |
neighborhoods, neighborhood, segregation, income, residential, racial, public, urban, black, blacks
Journals: City & Community, Sociological Spectrum, Theory and Society, Social Problems
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Massey D (1993) Am Apartheid Segrega | 0.28 | 72 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, racial, black, segregation | |
Wilson W (1987) Truly Disadvantaged | 0.22 | 75 | neighborhoods, neighborhood, poverty, high, studies | |
Raudenbush S (2002) Hierarchical Linear | 0.09 | 96 | survey, models, levels, multilevel, time | |
Florida R (2002) Rise Creative Class | 0.07 | 16 | cultural, neighborhood, residents, process, states | |
Sampson R (2002) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.07 | 39 | neighborhoods, neighborhood, health, exposure, behavior | |
Pattillo M (2007) Black Block Politics | 0.05 | 17 | neighborhoods, neighborhood, residents, gentrification, urban | |
Charles C (2003) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.03 | 25 | racial, neighborhoods, neighborhood, segregation, blacks | |
Jargowsky P (1997) Poverty Place Ghetto | 0.03 | 18 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, income, poverty, black | |
Royston P (2004) Stata J | 0.03 | 36 | models, children, school, national, survey | |
Rumberger R (1987) Rev Educ Res | 0.03 | 5 | school, high, black, graduation, educational | |
Jencks C (1990) Inner City Poverty U | 0.03 | 21 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, income, children, housing | |
Bourgois P (1995) Search Respect Selli | 0.03 | 10 | urban, ethnographic, poor, poverty, men | |
Gieryn T (2000) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.03 | 16 | place, community, processes, understanding, local | |
Jacobs J (1961) Death Life Great Am | 0.02 | 14 | neighborhood, residents, city, processes, neighborhoods | |
Wilson W (1996) Work Disappears Worl | 0.02 | 29 | survey, national, neighborhood, longitudinal, individuals | |
Logan J (1987) Urban Fortunes Polit | 0.02 | 18 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, political, residents, urban | |
Leventhal T (2000) Psychol Bull | 0.02 | 18 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, children, health, behavior | |
Farley R (1994) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 18 | neighborhood, racial, neighborhoods, residential, whites | |
Beck U (2006) Cosmopolitan Vision | 0.02 | 6 | processes, key, political, identity, cultural | |
Pribesh S (1999) Demography | 0.02 | 5 | schools, during, school, students, outcomes | |
Sampson R (2008) Demography | 0.01 | 12 | neighborhood, neighborhoods, income, residential, children | |
Conley D (1999) Being Black Living R | 0.01 | 18 | survey, longitudinal, differences, race, wealth | |
Smith N (1996) New Urban Frontier G | 0.01 | 9 | neighborhood, residents, examines, neighborhoods, gentrification | |
Logan J (2004) Demography | 0.01 | 17 | neighborhood, segregation, neighborhoods, areas, residential | |
Garreau J (1991) Edge City Life New F | 0.01 | 4 | urban, spatial, contemporary, dynamics, political |
prison, incarceration, penal, risk, work, prisoners, imprisonment, control, recent, criminal
Journals: Theoretical Criminology, Punishment & Society-international Journal of Penology, Ethnography, Deviant Behavior
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Garland D (2001) Culture Control Crim | 0.29 | 46 | criminal, state, crime, punishment, control | |
Foucault M (1977) Discipline Punish Bi | 0.16 | 38 | control, surveillance, practices, cultural, role | |
Western B (2006) Punishment Inequalit | 0.13 | 35 | incarceration, recent, men, states, united | |
Feeley M (1992) Criminology | 0.11 | 24 | law, penal, punishment, work, state | |
Garland D (1990) Punishment Modern So | 0.08 | 23 | state, criminal, examines, justice, prison | |
Sykes G (1958) Soc Captives Study M | 0.06 | 17 | prison, experience, imprisonment, prisoners, prisons | |
Beck U (1992) Risk Soc New Moderni | 0.05 | 20 | risk, second, political, change, first | |
Simon J (2007) Governing Crime War | 0.05 | 25 | criminal, state, law, punishment, penal | |
Goffman A (2009) Am Sociol Rev | 0.05 | 13 | united, states, risk, level, men | |
Crewe B (2009) Prisoner Soc Power a | 0.04 | 12 | prison, prisoners, experience, prisons, imprisonment | |
Clear T (2007) Imprisoning Communit | 0.04 | 14 | incarceration, criminal, association, consequences, incarcerated | |
Petersilia J (2003) Prisoners Come Home | 0.04 | 18 | incarceration, prison, work, significant, men | |
Reichman N (2001) Child Youth Serv Rev | 0.03 | 30 | child, families, fragile, children, wellbeing | |
Braman D (2004) Doing Time Outside I | 0.02 | 16 | incarceration, men, families, risk, incarcerated | |
Pager D (2007) Marked Race Crime Fi | 0.02 | 23 | work, men, time, contemporary, criminal | |
Pager D (2003) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 29 | incarceration, men, imprisonment, after, association | |
Wacquant L (2009) Punishing Poor Neoli | 0.02 | 12 | punishment, penal, theoretical, united, there | |
Foucault M (1991) Foucault Effect Stud | 0.02 | 16 | practice, work, rather, so, forms | |
Haney C (2006) Reforming Punishment | 0.02 | 7 | experience, current, process, explain, life | |
Cohen S (2002) Folk Devils Moral Pa | 0.02 | 9 | moral, crime, recent, argues, ways | |
Foster H (2007) Soc Probl | 0.02 | 11 | incarceration, association, incarcerated, children, families | |
Bury M (2001) Sociol Health Ill | 0.02 | 3 | people, ways, attention, conducted, accounts | |
Rose N (2000) Brit J Criminol | 0.02 | 8 | control, risk, work, crime, state | |
Wakefield S (2010) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.02 | 12 | incarceration, men, association, consequences, imprisonment | |
Pettit B (2004) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 14 | incarceration, men, association, risk, health |
health, socioeconomic, models, age, differences, status, mortality, time, life, survey
Journals: Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Demography, Population Research and Policy Review, Sociological Methods & Research
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Link B (1995) J Hlth Social Behav | 0.33 | 29 | health, models, socioeconomic, risk, mortality | |
Idler E (1997) J Health Soc Behav | 0.26 | 34 | health, survey, status, self-rated, differences | |
Palloni A (2004) Demography | 0.08 | 13 | health, status, differences, outcomes, mexican | |
Ryder N (1965) Am Sociol Rev | 0.06 | 13 | change, period, cohort, age, survey | |
Williams D (1995) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.06 | 17 | health, disparities, status, income, time | |
Singer J (2003) Appl Longitudinal Da | 0.06 | 32 | longitudinal, growth, trajectories, models, differences | |
Mirowsky J (2003) Ed Social Status Hlt | 0.06 | 20 | education, health, survey, national, differences | |
Preston S (2006) Demography | 0.06 | 9 | mortality, age, women, groups, health | |
Palloni A (2006) Demography | 0.05 | 11 | health, age, children, educational, birth | |
Pearlin L (1989) J Health Soc Behav | 0.05 | 23 | health, survey, mental, perceived, psychological | |
Nylund K (2007) Struct Equ Modeling | 0.04 | 10 | latent, class, used, five, identified | |
Hayward M (2000) Am Sociol Rev | 0.03 | 7 | differences, black, health, men, adult | |
Case A (2005) J Health Econ | 0.03 | 11 | health, early, educational, birth, poor | |
Bmuthen B (2004) Hdb Quantitative Met | 0.03 | 5 | mixture, had, growth, found, girls | |
Yang Y (2006) Sociol Methodol | 0.03 | 12 | period, cohort, survey, models, change | |
Muthen L (1998) Mplus Users Guide | 0.03 | 15 | health, latent, family, longitudinal, found | |
Mason K (1997) Demography | 0.03 | 5 | fertility, countries, change, important, period | |
Conley D (2000) Am Sociol Rev | 0.03 | 7 | early, educational, birth, age, children | |
Boardman J (2002) Demography | 0.03 | 6 | early, age, health, childhood, disparities | |
Behrman J (2004) Rev Econ Stat | 0.02 | 5 | outcomes, early, birth, individual, family | |
Pearlin L (1981) J Health Soc Behav | 0.02 | 24 | health, survey, process, life, levels | |
Riley M (1987) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 6 | age, women, reveal, trajectories, black | |
Yang Y (2009) Soc Forces | 0.02 | 6 | disparities, models, differences, health, levels | |
Mannheim K (1952) Essays Sociology Kno | 0.02 | 13 | change, changes, united, states, models | |
Ross C (1995) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 14 | health, risk, national, education, models |
survey, crime, discussed, states, criminal, national, related, theory, attitudes, fear
Journals: Feminist Criminology, Sociological Methods & Research, Punishment & Society-international Journal of Penology, Criminology
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Blalock H (1967) Theory Minority Grou | 0.20 | 42 | racial, composition, white, states, theory | |
Blumer H (1958) Pac Sociol Rev | 0.13 | 31 | race, theory, racial, threat, states | |
Allport G (1954) Nature Prejudice | 0.12 | 39 | contact, work, ethnic, positive, theory | |
Chiricos T (2001) Soc Probl | 0.11 | 11 | crime, criminal, states, threat, individual | |
Taylor M (1998) Am Sociol Rev | 0.07 | 19 | threat, ethnic, states, blacks, theory | |
Rountree P (1996) Soc Forces | 0.06 | 9 | crime, fear, perceived, perceptions, risk | |
Quillian L (2006) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.06 | 13 | racial, discrimination, race, attitudes, work | |
Quillian L (2001) Am J Sociol | 0.05 | 13 | threat, black, states, white, crime | |
Olzak S (1992) Dynamics Ethnic Comp | 0.05 | 18 | threat, u.s, perceived, race, public | |
Quillian L (1995) Am Sociol Rev | 0.05 | 22 | survey, ethnic, economic, states, theory | |
Covington J (1991) Sociol Quart | 0.04 | 7 | fear, crime, criminal, perceptions, risk | |
Chiricos T (1997) Soc Probl | 0.04 | 6 | crime, fear, media, criminal, risk | |
Warr M (2000) Criminal Justice 200 | 0.03 | 4 | crime, fear, criminal, perceptions, relationships | |
Steffensmeier D (1998) Criminology | 0.03 | 10 | sentencing, offenders, suggests, theoretical, criminal | |
Baumer E (2003) Am J Sociol | 0.03 | 7 | individual, race, states, united, ethnic | |
Ferraro K (1995) Fear Crime Interpret | 0.03 | 13 | crime, fear, risk, victimization, perceived | |
Curtin R (2005) Public Opin Quart | 0.03 | 8 | rates, survey, changes, respondents, studies | |
Pager D (2008) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.03 | 14 | discrimination, forms, race, groups, black | |
Liska A (1982) Soc Forces | 0.02 | 6 | crime, neighborhood, theoretical, criminal, individual | |
Freeman G (1995) Int Migr Rev | 0.02 | 4 | national, role, policy, during, countries | |
Ferraro K (1987) Sociol Inq | 0.02 | 10 | fear, crime, risk, victimization, related | |
Steffensmeier D (2000) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 6 | incarceration, sentencing, criminal, federal, offenses | |
King R (2007) Soc Forces | 0.02 | 8 | population, criminal, threat, states, minority | |
Keeter S (2000) Public Opin Quart | 0.02 | 10 | survey, respondents, estimates, residents, states | |
Jowell R (2003) European Social Surv | 0.02 | 8 | countries, european, survey, country, surveys |
educational, education, survey, high, school, students, differences, college, longitudinal, work
Journals: Sociology of Education, Social Forces, Demography, Social Science Research
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Buchmann C (2006) Am Sociol Rev | 0.35 | 21 | college, gender, women, differences, education | |
Manlove J (2007) Demography | 0.22 | 8 | relationships, sexual, including, health, behaviors | |
Morris M (1999) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.16 | 20 | inequality, labor, workers, income, united | |
Graber J (1996) Transitions Adolesce | 0.16 | 3 | contemporary, adolescence, health, family, young | |
Tavory I (2009) Am Sociol Rev | 0.11 | 10 | relationships, malawi, sub-saharan, condoms, survey | |
Rosenbaum J (2001) Coll All Career Path | 0.10 | 21 | educational, college, school, high, longitudinal | |
Mortimer J (2003) Working Growing Am | 0.09 | 11 | youth, work, development, school, life | |
Rosenbaum P (1983) Biometrika | 0.08 | 29 | propensity, survey, models, score, matching | |
Kreager D (2009) Soc Psychol Quart | 0.07 | 6 | relationships, sexual, longitudinal, sex, behavior | |
Kalleberg A (2000) Am Sociol Rev | 0.06 | 17 | work, labor, workers, outcomes, market | |
Shavit Y (1993) Persistent Inequalit | 0.06 | 10 | educational, attainment, education, levels, degree | |
Morgan S (2007) Anal Method Soc Res | 0.06 | 30 | education, models, survey, propensity, score | |
Sewell W (1975) Ed Occupation Earnin | 0.06 | 12 | educational, schooling, outcomes, education, important | |
Reynolds J (2006) Soc Probl | 0.05 | 8 | educational, school, high, outcomes, growing | |
Breen R (1997) Ration Soc | 0.04 | 15 | educational, education, attainment, college, higher | |
Schneider B (1999) Ambitious Generation | 0.04 | 14 | college, important, school, high, students | |
Piketty T (2003) Q J Econ | 0.04 | 10 | inequality, increased, income, change, private | |
Martin K (1996) Puberty Sexuality Se | 0.04 | 6 | relationships, gender, women, sexual, heterosexual | |
Goyette K (2008) Soc Sci Res | 0.04 | 6 | school, high, longitudinal, higher, education | |
Bernhardt A (2001) Divergent Paths Ec M | 0.04 | 8 | men, suggests, changes, increase, risks | |
Lucas S (2001) Am J Sociol | 0.04 | 10 | educational, education, lower, stratification, attainment | |
Fullerton A (2007) Soc Sci Res | 0.03 | 8 | change, work, better, review, jobs | |
Kohn M (1983) Work Personality Inq | 0.03 | 8 | structure, experience, work, personality, development | |
Staff J (2007) Soc Forces | 0.03 | 6 | attainment, work, youth, life, course | |
Raftery A (1993) Sociol Educ | 0.03 | 11 | educational, education, college, degree, family |
world, countries, economic, political, global, cross-national, international, development, levels, environmental
Journals: City & Community, Work and Occupations, Sociological Inquiry, American Journal of Sociology
Name | Centrality | Count | Keywords | |
Meyer J (1997) Am J Sociol | 0.19 | 31 | countries, world, models, global, international | |
Frank D (2000) Am Sociol Rev | 0.13 | 19 | world, global, cross-national, economic, organizations | |
York R (2003) Am Sociol Rev | 0.10 | 18 | environmental, environment, theoretical, theory, population | |
Schofer E (2005) Soc Forces | 0.09 | 15 | cross-national, world, countries, international, organizations | |
Alderson A (1999) Am Sociol Rev | 0.09 | 13 | countries, world, investment, inequality, economic | |
Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Anal Cro | 0.07 | 22 | rates, countries, panel, many, increases | |
Beckfield J (2003) Am Sociol Rev | 0.05 | 10 | countries, organizations, global, international, theories | |
Kentor J (2003) Am Sociol Rev | 0.04 | 9 | countries, cross-national, economic, investment, trade | |
Bunker S (2005) Globalization Race R | 0.04 | 10 | international, environmental, theories, structural, sociology | |
Gereffi G (1994) Commodity Chains Glo | 0.04 | 7 | global, international, trade, economic, globalization | |
Halaby C (2004) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.04 | 24 | panel, economic, changes, longitudinal, period | |
Chasedunn C (1995) Annu Rev Sociol | 0.03 | 6 | trade, world, international, theoretical, labor | |
Molotch H (1976) Am J Sociol | 0.03 | 12 | political, development, economic, theory, urban | |
Brady D (2007) Stud Comp Int Dev | 0.03 | 8 | countries, inequality, development, global, modernization | |
Schrank A (2004) Soc Forces | 0.03 | 5 | world, economic, particular, trade, specifically | |
Beck T (2001) World Bank Econ Rev | 0.02 | 7 | countries, rights, abuse, human, often | |
Dietz T (2007) Front Ecol Environ | 0.02 | 8 | environmental, environment, global, theories, theory | |
Alderson A (2002) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 14 | inequality, income, policy, countries, economic | |
Alderson A (2004) Am J Sociol | 0.02 | 6 | economic, global, world, countries, network | |
Wallerstein I (1974) Modern World System | 0.02 | 11 | global, sociological, overall, countries, empirical | |
Boli J (1999) Constructing World C | 0.02 | 12 | world, organizations, global, models, society | |
Clark B (2005) Theor Soc | 0.02 | 8 | environmental, ecological, understanding, theory, political | |
Jorgenson A (2009) Soc Probl | 0.02 | 9 | environmental, cross-national, environment, nations, emissions | |
Bair J (2001) World Dev | 0.02 | 4 | where, political, global, promote, labor | |
Schofer E (2005) Am Sociol Rev | 0.02 | 12 | countries, international, models, organizations, cross-national |
The clusters are sorted roughly by how many times they are cited in common works, so the smaller and/or more precarious clusters are at the end. If you don’t think the criminology journals belong, feel free to ignore those clusters. In the interest of space, I’ve trimmed off some of the smaller clusters, but you can take a look at the full list.
Based on my knowledge of sociology in general and the couple of areas I’m familiar with, the results seem plausible. Some specific cases may be less convincing, like I wouldn’t necessarily place DiMaggio and Powell (1983) near the center of the culture social movements cluster–the algorithm doesn’t excel at placing works, like the orgs literature, that span clusters and are primarily observed interacting with other major clusters. Addendum: The linked full list is slightly different because I used a different edge minimum. Major difference is DiMaggio and Powell jumping between movements and culture.
I particularly like when methodological words show up in topical clusters, like “survey” in the religion cluster, “interviews” in the culture cluster, and “longitudinal” in the education cluster.
A couple of caveats:
- Clusters shift when you use different node/edge minimums. In particular, works that span clusters tend to shift. Including more nodes tends to produce more clusters. Most often, new clusters are based on previously unsorted references and not on subdivisions of already existing major cliques.
- I wouldn’t read too much into small differences within a given cluster. Betweenness centrality is based on your ability to connect disparate nodes, so the score depends heavily on which unlisted works are included in the cluster. That said, as a whole I think the list does a good job in showing many of the most central works in the cluster.
- There are particularities in the ways the references are entered and the way references are handled. Some references are wrong, but more often the same work is cited multiple ways. This is especially true of books. I’m also not 100% sure I’m correctly parsing non-standard names like W.E.B. DuBois.
Despite these limitations, I would say that this analysis does a pretty good job of showing the major research areas in sociology and the central works in each of them. If it works for sociological journals, what about using the same method to look at social science research on social capital? It looks like social capital clusters on trust/participation (Putnam), management (Nahapiet), health (Kawachi), networks (Granovetter), entrepreneurship (Davidsson), education (Bourdieu), and environment (Smit). Again, this seems plausible. It probably would be useful to run an additional cluster analysis on just the cites in some of the clusters, but this wouldn’t be a bad starting place for looking at how we think about social capital.
Playing around with this for the last week, I’ve found it to be a pretty useful tool for quickly getting a handle on various literatures. For example, I made some for activism/social movements, climate change, Distinction, top orgs journals, social media, and terrorism. Note that the analysis of works that cite Distinction has Distinction showing up a couple of times under different names.
I’m working on putting this program online so you can upload your own Web of Science files, but I wouldn’t hold your breath. In the mean time, I’ve put the program and instructions on GitHub. It requires Python and a couple of dependencies, but most of the options are available from the command line.
Thanks for putting this together. It is interesting for many reasons, but it’s neat to see which fields are open to change.
For example, social psychology/work/identity cluster is dominated by lots and lots of old stuff. My areas (movements/orgs) is a bit younger – 1990s/early 2000s – with a single representative from my generation (Armstrong). Family seems to have a fair number of old and new things.
It’s also interesting to note that a lot of fields with recent cites are actually old ideas but updated (e.g., networks and Snijders development of p*, which was hatched by Wasserman as p1).
Interesting!
LikeLike
Also, why would anyone want to live in a neighborhood? They only thing sociologist find there is crime and segregation.
LikeLike
This is cool.
LikeLike
I’m surprised there isn’t more of a cluster for gender and sexuality (separate from work).
LikeLike
I was surprised too. Here’s five years of Gender and Society which is probably a better representation of the sociology of gender:
http://sociologicalresearch.org/clusters/gs/index.html
LikeLike
No cluster for inequality? Or is this an uber-cluster?
It’s also striking that inequality, social class, mobility, income, and stratification don’t appear as keywords. (Maybe “social class” can’t, because it’s two words?)
LikeLike
Cool stuff. I see in the code that you were playing with outputting the citation networks into JSON for d3.js. Did you get that working anywhere?
LikeLike
Thanks. Last I checked, the JSON should work for a d3 force layout. I wrote my own exporter so people didn’t need a non-standard NetworkX version and because I wanted to include node weights.
I haven’t done any visuals because the number of nodes/edges that make interesting clustering is often too many to display.
LikeLike
Yeah, I figured that it’d be rather busy and you’d be left with network-hairball visualization problem.
LikeLike
What a great start for folks getting a handle on a new area or just cross-checking their work. Thanks for analyzing and sharing!
LikeLike
I was not surprised by DiMaggio and Powell showing up in the movements cluster, especially given the increased emphasis on movements in orgs. In the management literature, movements are one example of a mechanism of organizational change which must be considered in relation to others.
Anyway, this is very cool.
LikeLike