more on handling biased media

Author Chris Hedges does a pretty good take-down of right-wing CBC host Kevin O’Leary here:

Just my impression, but it seems like progressives are more and more doing this kind of thing: directly attacking unfair attack journalism instead of either being overly calm or just avoiding the networks.

Author: andrewperrin

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

6 thoughts on “more on handling biased media”

  1. One of the things that struck me here is the pairing of a conservative host and a more neutral host. It’s almost like a punditry version of “good cop, bad cop.” The first host (I can’t find her name) knows who she is paired with and that she may need to help keep the peace. It has to be easier for Chris Hedges to confront Kevin O’Leary in this setting. Hedges knows there is an arbitrator in the interaction who will let him finish a sentence when O’Leary interrupts.

    In the US, partisan interview shows are centered around the personality of a single host, so I think it’s more difficult to directly challenge the host on their program. Also, the CBC has less tolerance for hosts calling someone a “nutbar” than US cable news. If Bill O’Reilly or Rachel Maddow called someone a “nutbar,” would their bosses say it’s a breach of policy? I think they’d just chuckle at the phrase nutbar.


  2. Not just progressives either, though you might very well be right that it’s a recent trend for progressives. Conservatives have for years been attacking journalism that they characterize (with varying degrees of plausibility) as unfair. Alterman makes a lot of this, which he calls “working the refs” and before than Herman and Chomsky called it “flak.”

    Some of these criticisms from the right are reasonable, many debatable, and some downright ridiculous. My favorite example of an absurd one is when Sarah Palin defended her stupid comments on Paul Revere by calling the following softball a “gotcha” question: “What have you seen so far today, and what are you going to take away from your visit?”

    You’ve also seen this a lot in the GOP primary debates, both from the candidates themselves and from the audience. My understanding, which may be wrong, is that a lot of the more infamous cheering/booing incidents were more about resentment of perceived loaded questions or cheap gimmicks by the moderators than about, for instance, actual glee at executions.


  3. Tufts sociologists Sarah Sobieraj has a Fox interview that is smooth like butter, but I have a feeling she could have handled it just fine if it had taken a turn for the hominem.

    Is it just me, or are these some of the smartest analyses I’ve heard on the news in years?


  4. I want to know what the difference between a “liberal nutbar” and a “liberal nutjob” is….. Apparently its less offensive- but maybe it has more calories than a conservative nutbar?

    Kudos to Sarah for an outstanding interview.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: