A great account from the NY Review of Books blog. From yesterday:
Below is a guest post from Nathan Palmer, creator of www.SociologySource.com a site focused on spreading ideas and resources for teaching sociology.
“Uh Professor, I think you are way off on this one. I know what your sociology research tells you, but people round here aren’t like that.”
Teaching students to see beyond the individual and at the sociological level is really hard. Especially in the United States we overvalue anecdotal personal experiences & undervalue empirical social facts. Worse yet, when student’s lived experiences differ from what sociological research finds, they believe that their lived experience invalidates the sociological research. So how can we get our students to see at the sociological level? Easy. Just put it in terms they understand.
Famous for writing, “Who cares if you listen?”* – an essay that reflected on the gulfs between composers listeners, Babbit was one of America’s great composers. He also taught Stephen Sondheim, which is a little hard to guess if you listen to his music. Here’s his second string quartet, which you can follow along with the score.
*Babbit complained of the title, and for good reason, it’s not really an accurate summary of what he says. But the folks at High Fidelity figured it would be more famous with their title. They were right. Babbit wanted to call it, “The Composer as Specialist.”
January 24, 2011
Dear members of the Collective Behavior and Social Movement Section of ASA
We write to express our outrage at the way in which our esteemed colleague, Frances Fox Piven, has been pilloried, even terrorized, by both the right wing media (most especially Glenn Beck of FOX News) and character-assassinating, vicious, right wing extremist blogs associated with (but not limited to) him. One of us first heard about these assaults Continue reading “frances fox piven under attack”
I am finally getting around to writing the second paper based on letters-to-the-editor data I collected in 2002 (!). I’m trying to decide whether to submit the paper to a sociology journal or a political science journal. Background: I think this will be a good paper, at least as important as the other one I published on these data.
Reasons for publishing in political science:
- Larger audience
- Opportunity for dialogue with scholars outside my discipline
- The argument is relatively political science-esque, and much of the referenced material is from political science
Reasons for sticking with sociology:
- The main colleagues I interact with regularly are sociologists
- It’s not everyday that I have an article with potential for placement in a top journal in my field
- Professionally, how will my own and other departments “count” a publication in a cognate discipline?
Alternative title: a too-long angry rant about how people (or the editors of people) with easily identifiable bugs in their bums when they write mean reviews should identify said bugs when they publish said reviews
Continue reading “disingenuous men write disingenuous reviews”
Or, how the United States wasted a day of my life.
Did you know that Americans with dual citizenship must declare the U.S. to be their “primary citizenship” (whatever that means) and must use their U.S. passport to enter the United States? I did not, but I have heard rumour that if a border guard catches a non-citizen in even the tiniest lie, you can be banned from entering the United States. Which is why, every time we cross the border, our family reports our citizenship as accurately as possible: one American, one Canadian, and one dual citizen. And we hand over Kid’s Canadian passport, and all is well. Not one time has a border guard mentioned that Kid needs a U.S. passport. Nonetheless, my rule of thumb is Don’t Antagonize the Border Guards, so as soon as I found out about the rule, I started doing the paperwork to renew Kid’s U.S. passport, which expired in 2009. Continue reading “my trip to the us consulate”