4 thoughts on “nourish the socijournals wiki.”

  1. In addition, perhaps it’s worth thinking in the comments about what types of contributions are most helpful.

    I went there searching for turn-around time at a journal, but found that the entries where reviewers gave pointers were nice additions. I’d also love more context (like months or something, as things tend to move faster in the summer than the academic year). Also, why weren’t (or were) reviews helpful, or where did you send the paper next?


  2. Hear hear! This has the potential to be a great resource for all of us, especially young scholars. I will redouble my contributions to this as both an author and reviewer.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: