Opened my email this morning to find this new (and in my opinion, horribly argued) report from the American Sociological Association, about the sociology job market. (EDIT – OLD REPORT).
Spoiler – their conclusion: “These findings suggest a relatively good market for new sociology PhDs.”
Their justification for this statement? There were more assistant professor jobs posted in the ASA JobBank in 2006 than there were people who received PhDs that year.
The authors (Jerry Jacobs and Roberta Spalter-Roth) do attempt to qualify this “finding” with a breakdown of substantive areas – open jobs, criminology jobs, theory jobs, etc. and … come to the same conclusion. They do not note that there are a glut of people who are looking for culture jobs, social movement jobs, and education jobs, or that most “open” jobs actually have a good idea of who they’re looking for (usually NOT culture or social movements or education).
My response: what drivel. I realize that ASA wants to put a shiny coating on what is happening in the academic job market world – that scatterplot discussed ad nauseum in the fall – but this “report” is ridiculous.
UPDATED: I read my email this morning without coffee first. The report above is from early 2008, before the economy tanked. They’re updating the results, available at this year’s ASA meeting: Here is the link to the preliminary findings for the New Jobs Survey:
Much more (appropriately) bleak. I still think the 2006 “conclusion” is ridiculous for job markets 2006-2008, however.