getting credit

This is about giving academic credit on an independent study basis for doing service or work for a community or political organization, where the faculty member is doing this as an optional overload.  It is not about official service-learning courses, nor about official internships that are part of a coherent program.  A number of organizations set up programs where students get academic credit for working for them through the mechanism of an independent study.  Recent requests have raised ethical issues for me, and I thought this might be a good topic for more general discussion and reflection.  The ethical issues such arrangements raise are both academic and political.  Here’s my thinking:
Academic issues.  Should a student get academic credit for a non-academic enterprise?  Some faculty say no.  Some faculty deal with this issue by requiring relevant reading and a paper as part of the package.  I have dealt with it by distinguishing graded and ungraded experiences.  Before I give a student an A for something and help their GPA, I like to know there was some academic content, and I personally don’t have the time to construct intellectually meaningful mini-courses around these experiences, so I mostly refuse to give independent study credit for a grade.  But I have been relatively liberal in agreeing to sign off on these on a pass/fail basis, figuring that it is good for students to have such experiences, and I am not distorting their academic credentials if I give no grade.  (The more organized of these programs provide detailed evaluations of the student’s participation, and the suggested grade is not always an A, although it is rarely lower than a B.)  But other people probably have different views on this.

Political issues.  Is it appropriate for the faculty member to impose a political criterion on what s/he is willing to sponsor on this kind of basis?  This is the issue that brought this to my mind.  In the past, I’ve signed off fairly liberally, even if I did not particularly agree with what the group was doing.  But I’ve been asked about a particular group lately that I just did not feel comfortable supporting, because I really disagree with its agenda.  On the one hand, this is a voluntary overload activity by the faculty member, so you can argue that you have no obligation to provide support for something you oppose.  And I know I would never give such support to a White racist organization.  But what about stuff that I merely disagree with but do not consider to be actively immoral?  And, on the support side, if I do make political distinctions about what causes I will and will not give implicit free labor to by this mechanism, am I in danger of running afoul of the principle that, as a public employee, I should not be using my position to support partisan causes?  (This issue could also come up about service to religious organizations.)

I welcome your thoughts.

Author: olderwoman

I'm a sociology professor but not only a sociology professor. I keep my name out of this blog because I don't want my name associated with it in a Google search. Although I never write anything in a public forum like a blog that I'd be ashamed to have associated with my name (and you shouldn't either), it is illegal for me to use my position as a public employee to advance my religious or political views, and the pseudonym helps to preserve the distinction between my public and private identities. The pseudonym also helps to protect the people I may write about in describing public or semi-public events I've been involved with. You can read about my academic work on my academic blog --Pam Oliver

One thought on “getting credit”

  1. That’s a tricky one. As an academic, are you supposed to be impartial and unbiased in your teaching? (I will forgo the discussion about how it is impossible to be unbiased.) If you try to be unbiased, then I would say you should allow this person to do the activity, whether you support it or not. The only reason to say no would be for reasons like hate crimes, which would eliminate a white supremacist group.

    An example: if you’re pro-choice, and someone wanted credit for working with a rabid but legitimate anti-abortion group, then they should be allowed to get credit for it, even though you disagree.

    That said, since this is voluntary and not required, I think you have more leeway in whether or not you choose to give credit. If this group really goes against everything you believe in, then perhaps you could suggest a colleague who would be more comfortable overseeing this person. You may also want to look at the issue in liberal/conservative terms. A lot of professors are getting flack for being “too liberal” and “anti-conservative.” If this is a conservative issue, then you can diffuse the situation by allowing the person to get credit – and thereby upholding your belief in the freedoms we all possess. (I hope that makes sense.)


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.