a philosophy cheat sheet for social theory

As I’ve been preparing to teach, for the first time, an Advanced Social Theory graduate seminar this fall, I’ve realized that it would be helpful to have a “cheat sheet” of philosophical terms useful for social theory. I am going to put one together and distribute it the first day of class. I ask you, O Scatterbrains, what terms ought to be included thereupon. Below is what I’ve thought of thus far. Let the suggestions begin; I will post the sheet when I complete it.

  • Ontology
  • Epistemology
  • Emergence
  • Metaphysics
  • Phenomenology
  • Positivism
  • Realism
  • Analytic

21 Comments

  1. Posted July 29, 2010 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    First thoughts for possible additions:

    Dialectic(al)
    Materialism
    Idealism
    Critical

  2. KMD
    Posted July 29, 2010 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    -Pragmatism/ist
    -Deconstruction
    -Modernity/Post-modernity
    -Semiotics

    • KMD
      Posted July 29, 2010 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

      Guess I should have looked at the syllabus, first. Not sure those terms I recommended will be useful.

  3. Posted July 29, 2010 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    Will the students get bingo cards?

  4. Posted July 29, 2010 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    McSweeney’s covered this today, too.

  5. Posted July 29, 2010 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Truth.
    Causation.
    Supervenience.
    Reduction.
    Eliminativism.
    Inference to the Best Explanation.

    But rather than write all this stuff up yourself, I strongly recommend you point your students at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, which is a terrific resource. As a rule, the entries are clearly written, up-to-date, and reliable discussions of most of the terms that have come up so far. If you care about getting this stuff right — especially with terms like “realism”, “positivism”, “reduction”, “emergence” and so on — I wouldn’t rely on any other online source.

    • krippendorf
      Posted July 30, 2010 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

      Supervenience? There’s one down the street from my house. Bad beer selection, but it’s open all night.

  6. Posted July 29, 2010 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Wow, y’all are amazing -thanks! And thanks for the reference to the Stanford Encyclopedia, which is a great resource. (Although its Adorno entry is pretty weak.)

    The McSweeney’s thing was strange, I guess just anti-intellectual–maybe I’m not in the mood to get that today?

    And the Bingo card might be a keeper :)

    • trey1
      Posted July 29, 2010 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

      McSweeney’s? Anti-intellectual? McSweeney’s can be accused of many things, but being anti-intellectual isn’t one of them. The reason that the list is even on there is because many of them probably already went to grad school for English. Hence, the joke.

      • Posted July 30, 2010 at 6:17 am | Permalink

        Gotcha, sorry – see, I told you I just didn’t get it!

  7. Jenn Lena
    Posted July 29, 2010 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    You know, your co-author (Jeff Olick) handed out a list of terms to us in Contemporary Theory years ago. You might see if he has it still. I found it to be invaluable, especially since I remember knowing…oh…10% of the terms on the list at the start of the semester, and made a point of knowing them all by the end.

  8. Claude Fischer
    Posted July 29, 2010 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Andy — For my 2 cents, almost none of this is social theory… It’s metatheory or philosophy of science…. social theory is about something substantive, like stratification, socialization, group dynamics, etc. But what do I know?

    • Posted July 30, 2010 at 5:10 am | Permalink

      Well, he did say he was putting together a list of specifically philosophical terms that you might run across in the course of doing/reading/thinking about social theory proper.

      • Posted July 30, 2010 at 6:17 am | Permalink

        Exactly – thanks Kieran. Claude, I agree these are not social theory, they’re concepts that are helpful to know, on top of which social theory is (sometimes) built.

  9. Posted July 30, 2010 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    Hegemony.

    Often used, rarely explained.

  10. Posted July 30, 2010 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Just read the McSweeny’s list. Once had a prof in another department (non-Sociology) circle the word “problematize” in a paper I wrote and say, “not a word.”

  11. practicingidealist
    Posted July 30, 2010 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps “theory” itself? The scientific explanation, vs. the commonly mis-understood definition of theory as a hypothesis? And the distinction between a “theory” and “metatheory?”

  12. kathydw
    Posted July 30, 2010 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    heuristic
    hermeneutic

  13. eischwartz
    Posted August 2, 2010 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Normative

  14. buridan
    Posted August 14, 2010 at 8:40 am | Permalink

    structure
    structuralism
    sign/symbol
    discourse/discursive
    determined/overdetermination/underdetermination
    interpretivism
    deontological/utilitarian
    commensurable/incommensurable/canonical
    humanist/humanism/anti-humanism
    subject/subjectivity

  15. Posted September 8, 2010 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Explanation
    Idealization


Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers