Great story on lying to your students as a way to teach critical thinking. Imagine that, telling your students that one thing out of each lecture will be a lie, and it’s their job to figure out which thing. Brilliant! Remind me to take up this idea for next year’s intro course.
-
Pages
-
Categories
- asa meetings
- ask a scatterbrain
- books
- Canada
- contest
- cryptic
- dialogues
- disarray
- dork
- economics
- family
- fun
- gender
- health
- help wanted
- inequality
- internet
- kids
- LGBT
- meta
- misadventures
- music
- online wonders
- personal
- politics
- procrastination
- professional
- race
- religion
- science
- sexualities
- sports
- students
- teaching
- too much information
- travel
- Uncategorized
- what does this have to do w/ org theory?
- work and family
- writing
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007

6 Comments
As always, please don’t try this at home.
@gymdandy – why not? i think it’s a pretty brilliant idea but i’d like to hear any substantive criticism of it.
Jerry Marwell used to tell his intro students that 10%* of everything he said was wrong. “The trouble is, I don’t know which 10% is wrong. If I did, I wouldn’t say it.” Same pedagogic point but perhaps better at helping students think about the sources of misinformation?
* I may have the % he said wrong. But you get the idea.
When I teach social psychology I lead off an early class describing an experiment, but lying about the results — telling them that the results turned out exactly the opposite of how they actually turned out. I then have the students react to the (wrong) result. They respond typically with how obvious the result was and have all kinds of reasons why the result obtained. I then tell them the result was the opposite of what they were lead to believe. I use this to teach about hindsight bias. And how ‘obvious’ results could not have been predicted in advance.
scorrell: I do something similar in Social Problems. I give students a week to explain why the follow are true.
1. Blacks drink more alcohol and do more hard drugs than Whites.
2. Why young adults were more opposed to the Vietnam War than older adults.
3. Why a smaller percent of people belong to a church today than in the time of the Pilgrims.
They come back with “logical” reasons. I then produce the graphs showing the data are not true. I use it to encourage them to question and check facts.
All great ideas. I am inspired, and that’s no lie.