amazon censors lgbt books

So a few folks have sent me notes about this. Basically, Amazon changed the way it “ranks” sales recently, and decided not to rank products that are “Adult”. So what, you might ask, is “adult”? The answer, it turns out, is anything gay. You can check out a list of de-ranked books here; they include the works of James Baldwin, Edmund White, EM Forster, Annie Proulx, Jeanette Winterson, etc. This has been happening for months. But rather than own up to it, Amazon is lamely suggesting that it’s a new “glitch”. A great critique of this is available in two great images. I guess according to Amazon, anything gay is pornography; anything straight, well, that’s just the way things are.

7 Comments

  1. Posted April 13, 2009 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    The Normal Accidents explanation from Patrick Nielsen Hayden; the Bantown explanation from tehdely.

  2. Posted April 13, 2009 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Patrick Nielsen Hayden at Making Light has a good post about how it may have happened, with links to other explanations. Tehdely suggests it could have been malicious intent from outside Amazon.

  3. Posted April 13, 2009 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Oops, spent too much time reading links before hitting post. :)

  4. Posted April 13, 2009 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    It seems likely to me that there was malicious intent from outside Amazon (in fact, I’m almost sure they were responding to some sort of anti-gay campaign to tag these books), but Amazon’s response has also been really pathetic. They still haven’t undone a lot of the delisting!

  5. Posted April 13, 2009 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    As of just now it seems that Lady Chatterley’s Lover has its rank, though many have said had been stripped. If it was stripped, it looks like Amazon replaced it. It is listed under “erotica” though, which I would argue with, especially when such well crafted literature as the Harlequin Romance Series is not.

    The bantown explanation does sound plausible, but I agree with Elizabeth, the response from Amazon has been terrible.

  6. Posted April 13, 2009 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Now, how am I ever going to find out if my book beats its all-time best rank of #97,368?

  7. Posted April 14, 2009 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Well, I cant speak for James Baldwin, but my rank is back. Shout out to #498,609!!


Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers