Hallelujah for academic templates! Wicked Anomie has brilliantly one-upped my research statement to lay out a basic template for a research paper. Although she notes that her outline best applies to quantitative work, I have found it helpful in the past to teach my qualitative students a (much more crude) basic layout of a quantitative paper as a starting point. It can be modified to suit the needs of the paper, but starting with this lends some structure to what often feels like unruly data.
-
Pages
-
Categories
- books
- Canada
- contest
- cryptic
- dialogues
- disarray
- dork
- economics
- fun
- gender
- help wanted
- meta
- misadventures
- music
- online wonders
- personal
- politics
- procrastination
- professional
- religion
- science
- sports
- students
- teaching
- too much information
- travel
- Uncategorized
- what does this have to do w/ org theory?
- work and family
- writing
-
Archives

4 Comments
Brilliant! Thanks a lot for pointing us there.
Both the research statement and manuscript thingy come at a marvellously good time for me.
As a graduate student completing my first manuscript review, I panicked and searched the internet for a reviewing how-to guide, which brought me to the following website: http://www.people.vcu.edu/~aslee/referee.htm#SUGGEST1
Though I have no reviewing expertise, I’ve found this outline extremely helpful. I’m wondering if more experienced reviewers think this is a decent model to follow, despite the clearly different disciplinary orientation. Also, if you don’t think this is a helpful guide, I’d love to know what you see as its limitations and/or where I might find a better guide.
Thanks for any comments you have!
Sorry, here’s the link to the top of the page: http://www.people.vcu.edu/~aslee/referee.htm
8 pages of lit review? Uggh.