<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: norm!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/</link>
	<description>the unruly darlings of public sociology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: carlyconfused</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>carlyconfused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>I'm a sociology grad student with a poli sci undergrad degree, and I'm more inclined to use the first definition.

And here I thought I had rid myself of all that poli sci stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a sociology grad student with a poli sci undergrad degree, and I&#8217;m more inclined to use the first definition.</p>
<p>And here I thought I had rid myself of all that poli sci stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belle Lettre</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle Lettre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>It's either recursive, or meta, or both!

I especially like the &lt;a href="http://www.artchive.com/artchive/e/escher/escher_hands.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;drawing hands one&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s either recursive, or meta, or both!</p>
<p>I especially like the <a href="http://www.artchive.com/artchive/e/escher/escher_hands.jpg" rel="nofollow">drawing hands one</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tina</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who finds it amusing that we are having a discussion about the normative use of normative? It's like Goffman meets M.C. Escher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who finds it amusing that we are having a discussion about the normative use of normative? It&#8217;s like Goffman meets M.C. Escher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belle Lettre</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle Lettre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>Actually by "law school" I mean legal theory, jurisprudence, and of course political theory.  

I can't remember seeing it much in literary criticism or theory though, and I did that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually by &#8220;law school&#8221; I mean legal theory, jurisprudence, and of course political theory.  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember seeing it much in literary criticism or theory though, and I did that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belle Lettre</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle Lettre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>The other sense of the word is really, really common in political science (my undergraduate major) and law school (technically I'm a lawyer) and it is used _all the time_ in Law and Society (the PhD stuff I'm doing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other sense of the word is really, really common in political science (my undergraduate major) and law school (technically I&#8217;m a lawyer) and it is used _all the time_ in Law and Society (the PhD stuff I&#8217;m doing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anomie</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>Anomie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1681</guid>
		<description>I was not aware of this first definition, either. This may explain why some of my students were confused when I used the term "normative" in class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not aware of this first definition, either. This may explain why some of my students were confused when I used the term &#8220;normative&#8221; in class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belle Lettre</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle Lettre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  This really cleared that up! I had no idea about the common definition for sociology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  This really cleared that up! I had no idea about the common definition for sociology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamybarab</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>jamybarab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>Um, yeah, I didn't know it had a different definition. Guess I'm really a sociologist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, yeah, I didn&#8217;t know it had a different definition. Guess I&#8217;m really a sociologist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimPanzee</title>
		<link>http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>JimPanzee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/norm/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough I feel like I grew up with this second definition of normative, the one meaning "related to norms." I remember reading about "normative philosophies" and "normative theories" later and remember having to look  up the word to discover that those were theories that prescribed (and proscribed) certain behaviors. Now that I've been studying poli sci for three years I'd actually forgotten I ever knew a different definition. 

The "related to norms" definition seems more intuitive now that I remember it exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough I feel like I grew up with this second definition of normative, the one meaning &#8220;related to norms.&#8221; I remember reading about &#8220;normative philosophies&#8221; and &#8220;normative theories&#8221; later and remember having to look  up the word to discover that those were theories that prescribed (and proscribed) certain behaviors. Now that I&#8217;ve been studying poli sci for three years I&#8217;d actually forgotten I ever knew a different definition. </p>
<p>The &#8220;related to norms&#8221; definition seems more intuitive now that I remember it exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
