Even as scientists in the United States are calling for the presidential candidates to participate in a debate about science, and to take back the role of Science Adviser from its current status as a travesty, Canada announces that it will eliminate its National Science Adviser position. That is moving in the wrong direction.
-
Pages
-
Categories
- ask a scatterbrain
- books
- Canada
- contest
- cryptic
- dialogues
- disarray
- dork
- economics
- fun
- gender
- help wanted
- kids
- meta
- misadventures
- music
- online wonders
- personal
- politics
- procrastination
- professional
- religion
- science
- sports
- students
- teaching
- too much information
- travel
- Uncategorized
- what does this have to do w/ org theory?
- work and family
- writing
-
Archives
2 Comments
In the US, I think the existence of the National Academy of Sciences is much more important substantively than the existence of a specific science adviser per se. Does Canada have a counterpart to that?
Yes, there is a similar organization, but this would be more of a lobbying organization than a part of the administration. I agree with Mooney that someone among the presidents’ advisers should be an expert on science.