speaking of snobbery

You try to keep the faith. You want to be fair. You certainly do not want to prejudge people based on where they are employed. The author/speaker is doing something with a title that seems maybe obliquely relevant to your interests, and just because they are based at a college you’ve never heard of–even though, by this point, you are a little surprised that there remain colleges you’ve never heard of–is no grounds just to presume it won’t be any good. And yet then, again and again: whoa! Holy bother is there some crazy botherbother going on in the hinterschools of social science! What the botherbotherbother is the impression of sociology that students get from these people?

I know, sounds bad. I will continue to keep the faith. And one does see good work, don’t get me wrong. Still, though. Holy botherbothering botherbother.

9 Comments

  1. laurabethnielsen
    Posted January 18, 2008 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, you really should have been there. And, how’s the sleeping?

    Holy bothering bother.

  2. Posted January 18, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Sorry to hear it! I hate disappointments of this sort.

    My version: The school you’ve never heard of except for this one scholar who keeps “contributing” to a mailing list you’re on. You don’t like the contributions, but the scholar gets invited to your school so you think: hmm.. maybe there’s something there that I’ve missed through those emails. You go to the talk. And.. same result as above. (Perhaps I should note that this was not in social science, just to protect the innocent.)

    So my question is this: how do people like that get invited for talks?

  3. Posted January 18, 2008 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    It’s posts like this why people think you are an ass-hatted wanker and a scurvy butt, you know.

  4. Posted January 18, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    Tina: I know! I know! I read the post myself and don’t feel good about it. And still!

  5. Posted January 18, 2008 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Tina: Also, note the restraint I showed in not blogging about the “scurvy butt” incident.

  6. Posted January 18, 2008 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    At least your detractors find you worthy of cleverly crafted insults. That has to count for something.

  7. crimsonglow
    Posted January 19, 2008 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    scurvy butt?!

  8. Posted January 19, 2008 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Someone unhappy with something I said on Scatterplot sent a long e-mail that included referring to me by the epithet ’scurvy butt.’ The person may well be right: to my knowledge, I’ve never had any vitamin C injected into my posterior.

  9. crimsonglow
    Posted January 19, 2008 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    That’s… awesome.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.