I’ve been in a snit all day about Hillary and gender, and so I decided to let some of it out. I’m really getting fed up with how the press is talking about Hillary using gender stereotypes and out-and-out sexism against her.
I’ve asked a lot of people who oppose Hillary the reasons why, and the vast majority of the time I haven’t received anything resembling a straight answer. Prying a little bit beneath the surface usually produced some kind of thinly-veiled version of she’s a “ball-busting bitch.” Typical crap leveled at any assertive, strong woman. There are tons of double standards at work here too. Men who engage in much more aggressive political behaviors are routinely excused, but when a woman starts to get pretty good at playing their game, they try to beat her back with accusations, either direct or indirect, of being some crazy cold-hearted opportunist. Have these people looked in a mirror lately?
Then something happens. A supposedly softer moment, and the same people pounce, with exactly the opposite response. I say supposedly, because the characterizations of this moment, which I’m sharing with you via the miracle of YouTube, are pretty different from what I observe here:
This incident has been described in the mainstream press as a “candidate cracking under pressure,” “weeping,” “sobbing,” “crying” “breaking down,” and so on. Really? Is that what you got out of it? If so, you better watch it again, and this time with a dictionary in hand.
What’s even worse is when another candidate, who some of us have found reason to admire in the past, jumps at the chance to exploit the situation by declaring this kind of display un-presidential and wraps himself in a ridiculous masculinist, tough-guy rhetoric, which I’ve got to say, sounds exactly like the rough-and-tumble-cowboy-on-the-eve-of-war kind of thing, George W. would say. I’m speaking of John Edwards, who I quote, “I think what we need in a commander-in-chief is strength and resolve, and presidential campaigns are tough business, but being president of the United States is also tough business.” Chances of Edwards getting a vote from me at this point: zero.
I could go on forever listing all the sexist crap shot at Hillary just in the last couple of days. Let me just give you a few more: shrill, hellish housewife, nagging, cackling, screechy, “an aging and resentful female,” and my personal favorite, “when Hillary Clinton speaks, men hear, ‘Take out the garbage.’” Not to mention the notion that she pretended to go all weepy and all the women out there couldn’t help going weak in the knees and just had to vote for her…
I’m not saying all of this is reason to be FOR Hillary. But if you’re going to be against her, for God sake, come up with something better than this crap.
I’m also not saying this is anything new, as anyone who has been paying attention during their sentient lives could tell you, but I don’t think we’re making enough noise about this junk in this election–not that we ever do make enough noise about it period!

10 Comments
These would be some of my reasons, *not* in order:
1. Not liking the idea of following the election of the son of the President-before-last with the election of the wife of the President-before-last.
2. Only reason is where she is is because of a husband who betrayed those who believed in him if not with the Lewinsky affair then with his pardons upon leaving office.
3. Showed a wild elitism in the way she screwed up health care reform, which was a major cause of the Republican takeover of 1994 which ended up doing harm roughly equivalent to the good of the Clinton presidency.
4. Has given every indication that if elected, will poll the bejeezus out of every issue and engage in variants of the triangulation strategy that her husband did.
5. Democratic candidate most likely to foolishly invade yet another country if elected.
6. Gratuitously provocative and potentially self-defeating choice for the Democrats given how many people of centrist views seem like they would be willing to vote for someone who holds the promise of being a substantially different president than what they’ve seen the last 20 years.
Yet, of course, if she’s the nominee I’ll vote for her.
I’m glad you said something about this clip. I jumped online to watch it after hearing about the “softer moment” three times within twenty minutes: NPR, BBC, and The World (I mean, this is not exactly Fox News here). A bit anti-climatic given the setup.
Yes! Might I add the pinching of Clinton’s cheeks, and the shouts of “iron my shirt!”?
Thanks for posting this. I’ve been really annoyed by how much of the negativity around her has been all about her gender and little else. It is certainly an important reality check about gender issues.
I totally agree and had a similar rant yesterday. Unfortunately, politics and the media coverage are so superficial that it’s rare that discussions go deeper than personality traits. After all, wasn’t Bush chosen because of his “good-ole-boy” personality, while Kerry and Gore were too “wooden.” Yes, I think women probably have a harder time crafting a “likeable” yet strong image, but in the end, much of the race is just a popularity contest.
I find all three potential democratic nominees equally offensive and inoffensive. I disagree with all of Jeremy’s reasons for not liking H Clinton. I actually think the charge of “how did they get here/what experience do they have?” is appropriate for Obama, Edwards AND Clinton. Their resumes are light for presidential contenders.
The sexist way Clinton is treated outrages me. It does make me support her more than I would based on her policies alone. (I don’t support any of them based on their policy positions–they’re all much too conservative.)
Also, I don’t understand why folks think Obama represents “hope” or why anyone thinks is is the most liberal (I’ll take progressive over liberal, if I can find it). With the exception of his views on the war, I can’t distinguish him from Clinton.
Then again, maybe that’s because I refuse to watch any of the speechifying.
I would agree with:
1. Not liking the idea of following the election of the son of the President-before-last with the election of the wife of the President-before-last.
3. Showed a wild elitism in the way she screwed up health care reform, which was a major cause of the Republican takeover of 1994 which ended up doing harm roughly equivalent to the good of the Clinton presidency.
4. Has given every indication that if elected, will poll the bejeezus out of every issue and engage in variants of the triangulation strategy that her husband did.
6. Gratuitously provocative and potentially self-defeating choice for the Democrats given how many people of centrist views seem like they would be willing to vote for someone who holds the promise of being a substantially different president than what they’ve seen the last 20 years.
AND
#. Late-comer on Iraq war opposition; waited until political wins blew strongly away from war to oppose it.
#. Was secretive during time as First Lady — remember the “first lady was not part of the government” argument over health care openness? Similar to Cheney “vice president is not part of executive branch” argument.
#. Is secretive now on presidential library materials related to first lady period
#.Has not articulated a broad foreign policy strategy.
Read a couple biographies too see what this woman is really like and how calculating she is. I did.
Also SHE is the one who said at the NH debate, ”I am an agent of change, I embody change. I think having the first woman president is a huge change,” which began her brining the gender issue up. Only when it looked like she was going to loose NH did the so called emotions come out and that’s when good old Bill started blasting away at Obama with half truths. Same old dirty politics. And now the feminists are jumping on the band wagon telling us we should vote for her because she is a woman. Funny how Obama and Richards didn’t say vote for us because of our race. I am a 58 yr. old woman and I will vote for who I think is best, not because of race or gender. Becuase she is a woman the other canidates need to pussy foot around her?
She knows how to play the political game very well!
Question everything. See and listen with your minds.
Peace!
http://mindtravels.wordpress.com/
That was incredibly shitty of Edwards. Could I get a source for that quote? I’d like to look into it.
I don’t like any of the candidates. But not for shallow reasons like “she cries too much”.